Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55736

in Floodwood, MinnesotaPopulation 1,344

45.56/ 100

Ranked #21,817 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #825 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 4.8%)

Ranked #61 of 65 Duluth, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 6.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.97 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

16.4 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

7.9 days/year

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.9 per million

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

7.8%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.4%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

4.7%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Floodwood, Minnesota (ZIP 55736) places in the bottom 32% nationally (21,817th) and the bottom 4.8% of Minnesota (825th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Physicians resides in the top 13.0% nationally, and dental providers is in the top 14.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, walkability lands in the bottom 2.5% nationally, distance to a nursing home stands in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled fine-particle registers in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled energy burden settles in the top 5.4% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 12.3% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 55726, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Duluth, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.9–34.2
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.3–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.5–11.8
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.9–10.5
Depression among adults24.9%21.8–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.7–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.8–39.9
Obesity among adults38.7%33.7–43.7
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%13.9–19.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.4–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.4–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%73.6–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.5–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%61.2–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.6%55.5–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%69.9–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.0–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.7%16.9–22.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.9–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%31.1–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.5–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.7–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.0–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.1–16.9
Any disability among adults36.0%32.1–40.2
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.8
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.7–20.7
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.7–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.9–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.9–14.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.5–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Loneliness among adults32.3%28.9–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–644.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle7.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription84.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate85.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households70.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+28.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age50.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$65,179$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$164,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$690$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured