Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55364

in Mound, MinnesotaPopulation 14,097

61.99/ 100

Ranked #3,521 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.0%)

Ranked #86 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 10.0%)

Ranked #77 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

25.2%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.3 mi

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

36.6%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.2%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.1%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

5.8%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.5%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.8%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mound, Minnesota (ZIP 55364), in overall standing, comes out in the top 11.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,521st) and the top 10.0% of Minnesota (86th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 0.5% nationally, fatal road crashes stands in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and modeled obesity resides in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally, utility shutoff stands in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled food insecurity sits in the bottom 9.8% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits in the top 7.3% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 55331, just across the boundary. Beyond that, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 34.5; chronic-disease standing 90.1 (top 10%) — 56 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,965 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.0%19.2–22.7
High blood pressure among adults29.9%27.8–32.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.7–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.1–5.5
Depression among adults26.8%24.6–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.1%7.2–9.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%32.8–37.1
Obesity among adults27.2%24.5–29.9
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.8%4.9–7.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.9–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.3%71.7–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.5%73.4–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.5–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%69.2–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.5%71.7–75.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%74.7–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%17.2–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%9.9–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.6%15.6–19.8
Short sleep duration among adults25.2%23.3–27.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.7%12.2–15.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.7–15.7
Frequent physical distress among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.2
Any disability among adults24.6%22.3–27.1
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.7
Mobility disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%17.4–21.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.7–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.4
Loneliness among adults30.7%28.2–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–642.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)2.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle6.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate81.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households56.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+20.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$108,725$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$459,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,105$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 1.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.49 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured