Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54961

in New London, WisconsinPopulation 14,485

50.87/ 100

Ranked #15,044 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #527 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.8%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

22.7%

in the top 15.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

1.7%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, New London, Wisconsin (ZIP 54961) ranks in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,044th) and the bottom 31% of Wisconsin (527th).

continue reading

A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography lands in the top 12.3% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking registers in the top 5.8% nationally, arsenic sits in the top 9.3% nationally, and expected annual loss rests in the top 10.5% nationally. Floodplain exposure is in the top 15.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 17% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lies in the top 17% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 54170, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%27.5–32.6
High blood pressure among adults36.0%32.9–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Depression among adults23.6%20.9–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.3–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%33.5–39.7
Obesity among adults38.6%33.5–43.8
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%10.1–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.4–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.3–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%75.1–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.1–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%62.6–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.0%63.0–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.8%74.3–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.1%17.5–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%14.1–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%25.9–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%28.4–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.7–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.8–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%13.0–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.5–15.4
Any disability among adults31.9%28.7–35.3
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.5–17.0
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.8–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.1–14.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.0–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Loneliness among adults30.2%26.7–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–645.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription85.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate70.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households55.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age42.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$71,824$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$221,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$865$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured