ZIP code
54946
in King, WisconsinPopulation 401
63.36/ 100
Ranked #2,776 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.7%)
Ranked #40 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 5.3%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
22.2%
in the top 0.03% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
19.7%
in the top 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
2.1%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
1.3%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
22.5%
in the bottom 0.01% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Stroke
7.8%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
2.8%
in the bottom 0.03% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
60.9%
in the top 0.10% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
6.9%
in the bottom 0.06% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
4.3%
in the bottom 0.06% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, King, Wisconsin (ZIP 54946) sits in the top 8.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,776th) and the top 5.3% of Wisconsin (40th).
A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 0.01% nationally, transportation registers in the bottom 0.03% nationally, and short sleep is in the bottom 0.01% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the top 0.03% nationally, and mammography registers in the top 0.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 0.04% nationally, and stroke lies in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 0.10% nationally, and high cholesterol is in the top 0.2% nationally. Slow internet speeds lies at the national maximum.
Placed beside its immediate neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Locally, no neighbor ranks healthier overall than this ZIP.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 85%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 94%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.3%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 89%
5%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 58%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Disability
healthier than 26%
7%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 86%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 76%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.5%
21%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
54981
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 55.00
Similar health profile
92637
California99% similar profile
Score 63.72
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 48.8% | 43.2–54.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 60.9% | 55.1–66.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 22.2% | 19.4–25.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 7.0% | 6.1–8.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 19.7% | 15.6–24.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.2% | 6.9–14.2 |
| Depression among adults | 10.7% | 8.8–12.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 20.5% | 16.5–24.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 51.8% | 47.0–56.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 27.9% | 22.0–34.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 7.8% | 5.8–9.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.0% | 7.2–11.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.8% | 3.1–11.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 91.8% | 89.6–93.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 91.1% | 89.0–92.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 96.5% | 95.4–97.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 83.3% | 79.6–86.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 74.3% | 71.4–77.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 86.4% | 81.5–90.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 6.9% | 5.6–8.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 7.0% | 4.3–9.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.3% | 22.8–41.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 22.1% | 18.0–26.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 21.1% | 14.9–29.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 6.3% | 4.9–7.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.1% | 11.3–19.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 7.8% | 5.4–10.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 44.5% | 35.2–53.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 22.2% | 17.9–26.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.2% | 5.5–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.2% | 17.4–31.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.0–6.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.9% | 4.0–8.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 16.5% | 12.3–21.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 4.3% | 2.7–6.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 3.8% | 2.4–5.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 2.1% | 1.5–2.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 2.8% | 2.0–3.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 22.5% | 18.0–27.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 1.3% | 0.9–1.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 17.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 12.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762 |
| Population 65+ | 94.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768 |
| Median age | 80.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $914 ($696–$1,261) n=706 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 67.7 yr ± 1.83 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.83 years of 67.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured