Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54733

in Dallas, WisconsinPopulation 1,333

48.12/ 100

Ranked #18,786 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #648 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.82 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

30 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

18.1%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Dallas, Wisconsin (ZIP 54733) places in the bottom 41% nationally (18,786th) and the bottom 15% of Wisconsin (648th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: childcare lands in the top 3.6% nationally, and fiber broadband stands in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 13.8% nationally, and disaster risk settles in the bottom 15% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 17% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled nitrate lies in the top 6.2% nationally, fine-particle rests in the top 6.9% nationally, and binge drinking resides in the top 11.2% nationally. Fatal road crashes is in the top 13.3% nationally. Recreation lands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For readers new to these terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 54728, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%25.9–32.2
High blood pressure among adults36.4%32.6–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.6–10.2
Depression among adults24.7%21.3–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.8–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.3–39.9
Obesity among adults39.5%33.1–46.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%14.9–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.1–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.6–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%73.5–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.5–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.8%62.1–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.1%57.7–64.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%68.5–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%15.9–22.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%14.7–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.6%26.9–36.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%27.2–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.4–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.9–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.5–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.2–17.3
Any disability among adults33.6%29.1–38.1
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.3–10.9
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.0–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.3–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%11.6–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.7%12.8–18.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.8–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.8–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)13.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate86.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households70.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+29.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age48.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$58,421$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$177,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$796$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured