Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54566

in Wabeno, WisconsinPopulation 1,453

44.72/ 100

Ranked #22,701 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #731 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

64.7%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

23.2 mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10.1 per million

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.6 days/year

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.4%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.3%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

66.1%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Wabeno, Wisconsin (ZIP 54566), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 29% nationally (22,701st) and the bottom 4.2% of Wisconsin (731st).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: distance to an emergency room lies in the top 3.8% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled fine-particle is in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the top 10.1% nationally, and walkability registers in the bottom 11.1% nationally. On the stronger side, park land is in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and humid heat is in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 54104, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 92.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 11.2 — 81 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #431 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%31.5–38.9
High blood pressure among adults42.9%38.7–47.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.8–11.9
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.8%9.4–12.2
Depression among adults24.0%20.5–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%14.7–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.3%36.8–45.6
Obesity among adults43.2%35.5–50.8
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.7–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.3–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.2%79.6–84.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.0–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%62.1–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.5%56.7–64.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.1–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.2–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%17.1–22.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.8%29.8–40.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%28.3–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%22.0–28.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.2–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.7–17.4
Any disability among adults38.8%34.3–43.6
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Independent living disability among adults11.1%9.9–12.6
Mobility disability among adults20.6%18.0–23.3
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%18.0–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.4–19.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.4–22.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.3–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.5–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6427.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription82.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households51.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+24.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age49.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$56,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$209,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$658$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 1.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.60 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured