Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54538

in Lac Du Flambeau, WisconsinPopulation 3,025

45.55/ 100

Ranked #21,826 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #721 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 5.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10.4 per million

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

18.8 mi

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

8.9 days/year

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

27.4%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.2%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

57.3 mi

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.3%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.7%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Lac Du Flambeau, Wisconsin (ZIP 54538) lands in the bottom 32% nationally (21,826th) and the bottom 5.6% of Wisconsin (721st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: mental-health providers settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and grocery resides in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 9.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Set against that, poverty sits in the top 8.6% nationally, and unemployment is in the top 9.3% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 54512, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%29.3–35.7
High blood pressure among adults41.5%37.6–45.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults13.0%11.5–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Depression among adults23.5%20.2–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.7%14.6–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.6–42.5
Obesity among adults43.3%36.8–49.7
Stroke among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.7–15.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.7–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.6–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%75.7–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.7–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%61.9–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%57.3–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%66.3–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.1–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%16.8–23.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%28.7–38.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%27.6–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.6%21.4–27.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.0–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.4–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.3–17.3
Any disability among adults38.4%34.0–42.7
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Mobility disability among adults19.6%17.2–22.2
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.6–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.6–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%17.6–24.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.1%17.8–24.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.7–17.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.0–13.4
Loneliness among adults31.3%27.0–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.0–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6419.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)10.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle7.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription90.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate72.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households61.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+27.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age44.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$51,429$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$320,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$543$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.0 yr ± 2.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.33 years of 83.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured