Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54422

in Curtiss, WisconsinPopulation 1,553

47.13/ 100

Ranked #19,994 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #685 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

22.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

65.8%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

9.2%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

0.61%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

14.5%

in the top 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

13.5%

in the top 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

17.7%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

9.0%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US68th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Curtiss, Wisconsin (ZIP 54422) places in the bottom 38% nationally (19,994th) and the bottom 10.3% of Wisconsin (685th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled humid heat is in the bottom 11.3% nationally, and unemployment lands in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 18% nationally. Pulling the other way, households without a vehicle registers in the top 3.7% nationally, home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 5.3% nationally. Walkability lies in the bottom 10.0% nationally, modeled binge drinking rests in the top 11.9% nationally, and modeled fine-particle resides in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

For readers new to these terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 54425, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%23.5–28.4
High blood pressure among adults31.4%28.4–34.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Depression among adults22.5%19.7–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.0–37.5
Obesity among adults40.1%34.6–46.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.2–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%12.2–17.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%73.2–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.2%69.9–76.4
Cholesterol screening among adults81.5%79.5–83.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%61.5–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.6%54.4–60.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.8–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%16.3–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.5–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.3%30.1–38.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%29.2–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%19.6–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.8–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.7–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.6–18.5
Any disability among adults34.1%30.2–38.1
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.7–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.0–20.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.1%15.4–20.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.7–15.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Loneliness among adults32.6%28.6–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6446.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)32.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle22.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription65.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate70.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population15.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households42.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+9.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age22.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$71,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$156,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$736$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured