Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54302

in Green Bay, WisconsinPopulation 30,333

47.08/ 100

Ranked #20,063 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #686 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 10.1%)

Ranked #30 of 30 Green Bay, WI ZIPs (bottom 3.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.1%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

50.6%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.5%

in the top 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.2%

in the top 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

171 units

in the top 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

17.4%

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

78 intersections/sq mi

in the top 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 54302, one of several in Green Bay, Wisconsin sits in the bottom 37% nationally (20,063rd) and the bottom 10.1% of Wisconsin (686th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: distance to a Superfund site resides at the national minimum, modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled obesity stands in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled uninsured resides in the top 7.9% nationally, homeownership sits in the bottom 9.4% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 12.0% nationally. Crowded housing resides in the top 13.0% nationally, and modeled fine-particle sits in the top 13.6% nationally. Better still, distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 13.3% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 54301, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Green Bay, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 10.2; chronic-disease standing 63.9 — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,775 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.7–26.3
High blood pressure among adults32.1%29.2–35.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Depression among adults23.1%20.4–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.2–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%30.2–36.4
Obesity among adults45.1%40.4–50.2
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.4–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.8%14.8–19.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.4%71.6–77.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%72.1–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults80.7%78.6–82.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.5%59.3–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%57.1–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%72.8–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.9–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.8–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.8%31.9–39.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%29.2–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%21.9–27.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.5–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.4–19.1
Any disability among adults34.3%30.8–38.1
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.5–11.7
Mobility disability among adults15.8%14.0–17.7
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.9–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.9%20.3–25.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.1%20.8–25.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.4%15.3–19.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.2–12.7
Loneliness among adults32.3%28.4–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate50.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population15.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households43.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age33.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$58,506$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$175,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$887$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured