Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54141

in Little Suamico, WisconsinPopulation 2,861

57.62/ 100

Ranked #6,707 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #173 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #11 of 30 Green Bay, WI ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.73 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

92.5%

in the top 12.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Little Suamico, Wisconsin (ZIP 54141) sits in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,707th) and the top 23% of Wisconsin (173rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: childcare rests in the top 4.7% nationally, modeled utility shutoff sits in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and homeownership registers in the top 12.7% nationally. Modeled transportation lands in the bottom 13.7% nationally, short sleep resides in the bottom 15% nationally, and disaster risk lies in the bottom 15.0% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking settles in the top 7.4% nationally, and obesity stands in the top 13.9% nationally. Modeled fine-particle is in the top 17% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 54171, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Green Bay, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%24.5–31.0
High blood pressure among adults33.0%29.1–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.6–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.1
Depression among adults23.4%20.1–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.1–40.3
Obesity among adults41.8%34.5–49.2
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.7%6.9–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.3–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%74.8–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.8–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.0–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%64.9–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.7%66.2–72.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%70.5–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.7%16.4–23.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.1–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%21.9–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.1–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%13.8–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.7–13.9
Any disability among adults29.4%25.4–33.5
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.6–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.9–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.8–11.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.2–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–642.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription93.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate92.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+19.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$101,553$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$288,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$946$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured