Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54028

in Woodville, WisconsinPopulation 2,574

55.35/ 100

Ranked #9,028 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #278 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #167 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.2%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

14.3 mi

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Woodville, Wisconsin (ZIP 54028) lands in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,028th) and the top 36% of Wisconsin (278th).

continue reading

The profile opens on a set of genuinely favorable readings: fiber broadband lies in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas sits in the bottom 14.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking rests in the top 5.5% nationally, modeled fine-particle is in the top 10.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center stands in the top 13.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 54002, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.5–29.4
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.5–37.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Depression among adults22.9%19.8–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.1–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.4%29.9–37.5
Obesity among adults37.3%31.6–43.5
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.2–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.6–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.0–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.9%72.4–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.3–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%63.2–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.7%64.3–70.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%72.0–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.2%17.1–23.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.3–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%23.3–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%28.7–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.9%14.6–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.4–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.5–14.8
Any disability among adults29.9%26.2–33.9
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Mobility disability among adults13.0%11.1–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.0–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.4–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.8–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.4–34.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–648.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate68.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$85,341$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$269,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$957$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured