Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54016

in Hudson, WisconsinPopulation 33,398

62.07/ 100

Ranked #3,487 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.9%)

Ranked #64 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 8.4%)

Ranked #76 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Utility shut-off threat

4.0%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.3%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.7%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

325 units

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.1 ppb

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US92nd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.1%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Hudson, Wisconsin (ZIP 54016) lands in the top 10.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,487th) and the top 8.4% of Wisconsin (64th).

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled utility shutoff sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 5.9% nationally, modeled housing insecurity resides in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the bottom 7.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 5.2% nationally, disaster risk lies in the top 5.8% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the top 6.0% nationally. Lead in tap water sits in the top 7.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 55082, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 28.7; chronic-disease standing 82.8 — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,813 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.8%22.0–27.7
High blood pressure among adults31.8%28.4–35.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.0
Depression among adults22.2%19.3–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.1–10.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.5–36.9
Obesity among adults35.5%30.2–41.6
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.4%4.3–6.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.6–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.8–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%73.6–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.5–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.8%65.4–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.9%69.9–75.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%73.6–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.3%17.2–23.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.6–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.3–26.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%26.9–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.1%12.1–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%9.8–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Any disability among adults25.5%22.1–29.0
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.2–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.8%15.2–20.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.8–9.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.6
Loneliness among adults27.7%23.8–31.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.5–4.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)49.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription94.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate79.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age42.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$113,085$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$452,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,417$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured