Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53968

in Wonewoc, WisconsinPopulation 2,429

48.28/ 100

Ranked #18,577 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #643 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

11.1%

in the bottom 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.86 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

78.4%

in the bottom 14.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

0.10%

in the bottom 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

3.9%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Wonewoc, Wisconsin (ZIP 53968) lands in the bottom 42% nationally (18,577th) and the bottom 16% of Wisconsin (643rd).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas stands in the bottom 11.8% nationally, recreation rests in the top 12.0% nationally, and childcare registers in the top 14.5% nationally. Unemployment resides in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 18% nationally. Fiber broadband is in the top 21% nationally. On the other side, home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 14.2% nationally, and modeled obesity lands in the top 15% nationally. Crowded housing lies in the top 19% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. On the overall standing, ZIP 53924, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%29.3–34.9
High blood pressure among adults39.3%36.0–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.3–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.3–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Depression among adults24.7%21.9–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.5–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%35.1–41.8
Obesity among adults41.5%35.7–47.5
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.8–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.2–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%78.3–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.5–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.6–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.9–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.0%61.9–67.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%71.9–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%15.4–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%16.1–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.4%28.2–36.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%26.7–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.7–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.4–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%13.1–16.2
Any disability among adults35.3%31.6–39.0
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.8
Mobility disability among adults17.8%15.7–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%18.3–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.8–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.8–18.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.6–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6420.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)14.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)0.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription78.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate85.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households57.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age38.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$74,479$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$207,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$764$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured