Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53827

in Woodman, WisconsinPopulation 429

46.19/ 100

Ranked #21,134 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #705 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 7.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

32.6%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.5%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.5%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.8%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.2%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

53.4%

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

8.8 days/year

in the top 38% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Woodman, Wisconsin (ZIP 53827) sits in the bottom 34% nationally (21,134th) and the bottom 7.7% of Wisconsin (705th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: unemployment is in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled obesity rests in the top 5.3% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 9.2% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled radon lands in the top 12.1% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 15% nationally. Home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 20% nationally. More positively, modeled pfas settles in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled tree cover is in the top 20% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, unemployment runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 53805, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.3–34.9
High blood pressure among adults37.4%33.5–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Depression among adults24.5%21.1–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.5–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.3–41.4
Obesity among adults44.5%37.6–51.6
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.1–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.2–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.8–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.2–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.6–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.5%62.6–72.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.5–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%70.6–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.5–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.3–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.7%30.7–40.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%29.2–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.7%18.7–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%12.9–16.7
Any disability among adults34.9%30.6–39.2
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.2–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%11.8–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.5%13.8–19.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.0–12.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.7
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.3–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–644.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)8.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)32.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription81.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate88.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households79.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+25.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age51.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$81,607$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$163,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$725$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured