Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53807

in Cuba City, WisconsinPopulation 4,209

54.26/ 100

Ranked #10,369 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #345 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.22 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.3%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

9.1 days/year

in the top 38% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Cuba City, Wisconsin (ZIP 53807) comes out in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,369th) and the top 45% of Wisconsin (345th).

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: grocery lies in the top 6.2% nationally, modeled utility shutoff sits in the bottom 10.9% nationally, and poverty settles in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Modeled pfas registers in the bottom 13.4% nationally, mammography stands in the top 11.7% nationally, and loneliness lands in the bottom 17% nationally. Modeled transportation is in the bottom 19% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon resides in the top 6.4% nationally, and binge drinking rests in the top 14.9% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

In plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 53808, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.3%26.7–32.1
High blood pressure among adults34.5%31.3–37.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.8–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.1
Depression among adults23.3%20.5–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%33.1–39.8
Obesity among adults40.7%35.0–46.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%9.0–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.1–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.7–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.9–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.8–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.6–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.2%65.3–70.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%74.5–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%16.0–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.1–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%25.9–34.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%28.4–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.5–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.9–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.4–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.3–14.2
Any disability among adults30.7%27.3–34.2
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.2–8.9
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.8–16.6
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.9–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.3–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Loneliness among adults29.4%25.8–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–644.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate82.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+21.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$77,887$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$225,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$780$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured