Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53566

in Monroe, WisconsinPopulation 14,901

54.62/ 100

Ranked #9,929 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #323 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #48 of 67 Madison, WI ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.5 mi

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Monroe, Wisconsin (ZIP 53566) stands in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,929th) and the top 42% of Wisconsin (323rd).

continue reading

Several of the strongest readings define how this area looks: elder services rests in the top 5.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Grocery settles in the top 7.3% nationally, dental providers rests in the top 9.2% nationally, and modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff settles in the bottom 12.2% nationally. On the other hand, modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 4.4% nationally, distance to a community health center lands in the top 6.9% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled radon rests in the top 12.5% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 53502, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Madison, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.4 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.8 years — 3.4 years below them.

    Ranked #2,636 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.0–32.6
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.3–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Depression among adults23.0%19.7–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%9.9–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%32.9–41.5
Obesity among adults40.3%33.1–47.8
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.6–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.5–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.5–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.2–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.2–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%64.0–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.5%63.0–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%72.0–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%14.9–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.8–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.1–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%26.8–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.4–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.3–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.8–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.3–14.3
Any disability among adults31.3%27.3–35.4
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.1
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.3–16.2
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.1–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.7–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults28.6%24.3–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription87.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate68.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households55.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+22.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$74,058$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$220,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$868$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured