Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53522

in Browntown, WisconsinPopulation 943

48.52/ 100

Ranked #18,285 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #629 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #65 of 67 Madison, WI ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

0.98 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

27.4 mi

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.5%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.9%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.3%

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.46%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

5.9%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Browntown, Wisconsin (ZIP 53522), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 43% nationally (18,285th) and the bottom 18% of Wisconsin (629th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: civic rests in the top 4.3% nationally, modeled pfas settles in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and modeled mammography lands in the top 10.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 13.3% nationally, and transportation noise settles in the bottom 14.6% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a community health center lands in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled radon rests in the top 8.7% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity lands in the top 9.4% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 13.6% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 53504, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Madison, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.3–35.2
High blood pressure among adults39.4%35.3–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.3–10.0
Depression among adults23.6%20.3–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.5–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%34.9–43.4
Obesity among adults42.9%36.0–50.1
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.3–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.5–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.2–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.1–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.6–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%63.3–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.8%60.4–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%73.3–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.5–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.1–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%25.9–35.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%28.9–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%17.7–23.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.0–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.1–15.9
Any disability among adults33.8%29.4–38.5
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.3
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.0–19.1
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.1–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.2–14.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.2–16.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.0–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Loneliness among adults28.9%24.7–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–648.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)11.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription84.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate83.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households62.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age48.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$81,528$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$205,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$950$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured