ZIP code
53192
in Wilmot, WisconsinPopulation 252
53.83/ 100
Ranked #10,923 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)
Ranked #380 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 50%)
Ranked #7 of 11 Kenosha, WI ZIPs (bottom 36%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.90%
in the bottom 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
99.1%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS5thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Park land
13.4%
in the top 9.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS90thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
19.2%
in the top 9.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST61stUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
9.4 mi
in the top 12.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS88thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Outer-floodplain exposure
2.0%
in the top 15% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS85thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
8.7%
in the top 20% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS80thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Wilmot, Wisconsin (ZIP 53192) ranks in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,923rd) and the top 50% of Wisconsin (380th).
A number of measures pull each way for this area: poverty resides at the national minimum, and home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum. Housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and homeownership stands in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Park land is in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Set against that, fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Close by, ZIP 53105, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kenosha, WI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 86%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 71%
13%
Disability
healthier than 63%
7%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 50%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 45%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 43%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 44%
5%
Holding it back
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 88%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 40%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 43%
13%
Disability
healthier than 53%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Risk Behavior
healthier than 32%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 20%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 12%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
in the top 0.00%
16%
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 67%
13%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 56%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 33%
11%
Disability
healthier than 22%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 33%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
53105
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 56.80
Closest healthier
53179
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 54.07
Similar health profile
63013
Missouri92% similar profile
Score 53.07
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 31.4% | 27.7–35.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 36.0% | 32.0–40.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.3% | 8.2–10.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.4% | 9.9–13.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.0% | 5.9–8.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.5% | 6.1–9.4 |
| Depression among adults | 25.1% | 21.5–29.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.0% | 10.0–14.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 35.6% | 31.6–39.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 41.2% | 35.2–47.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.5% | 3.0–4.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.5% | 10.1–15.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.1% | 5.9–10.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.8% | 75.3–81.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.6% | 73.9–81.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.6% | 85.4–89.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 67.3% | 62.9–71.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 68.3% | 65.1–71.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.0% | 73.0–84.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 19.2% | 16.0–22.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.4% | 12.7–20.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 27.6% | 22.4–33.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.6% | 29.3–38.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.9% | 15.3–23.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.9% | 13.6–18.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.1% | 11.8–16.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.1% | 10.8–15.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 30.9% | 26.0–36.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.1–8.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.0% | 6.6–9.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.4% | 11.7–17.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.2–4.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.5% | 3.8–5.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.5% | 17.2–23.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 8.5–14.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 12.2% | 9.1–15.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.6% | 7.6–11.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.4% | 5.2–7.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.4% | 25.1–33.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.3% | 4.3–6.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 21.6% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 39.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | 99.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762 |
| Population 65+ | 24.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768 |
| Median age | 56.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755 |
| Median home value | $264,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $914 ($696–$1,261) n=706 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.8 yr ± 2.09 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.09 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured