Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52774

in Welton, IowaPopulation 101

50.05/ 100

Ranked #16,181 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranked #657 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.0%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.1 mi

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

33.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.2%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

47 intersections/sq mi

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Welton, Iowa (ZIP 52774) ranks in the bottom 50% nationally (16,181st) and the bottom 29% of Iowa (657th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Poverty resides in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other side, distance to a community health center resides in the top 7.6% nationally, floodplain exposure stands in the top 8.5% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled arsenic resides in the top 9.8% nationally, and energy burden stands in the top 8.6% nationally.

Against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 52037, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.1–38.0
High blood pressure among adults40.9%36.4–45.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.4–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.1–10.5
Depression among adults19.5%16.3–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%10.9–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.0–44.1
Obesity among adults38.6%31.4–45.9
Stroke among adults4.3%3.6–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.2–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%4.8–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.2–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.0–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.4–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%60.9–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.1%62.5–69.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%67.1–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%15.8–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%13.2–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%22.5–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%26.7–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%15.7–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.2–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.3–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.0–15.4
Any disability among adults31.0%26.3–36.0
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.4–11.2
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.7–9.5
Mobility disability among adults16.0%13.2–19.1
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.3–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.9–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.5–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.4–12.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.6–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.1–7.3
Loneliness among adults30.6%25.9–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.9–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households70.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age44.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$71,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$118,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$925$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured