Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52650

in Sperry, IowaPopulation 799

56.13/ 100

Ranked #8,129 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #186 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.2 µg/L

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.0%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.5%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$105,255

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sperry, Iowa (ZIP 52650) ranks in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,129th) and the top 20% of Iowa (186th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: fiber broadband is at the national maximum, and lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Poverty lies at the national minimum, and civic is in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled pfas registers in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 12.4% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 4.8% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water is at the national maximum.

For context, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 52637, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%27.7–34.5
High blood pressure among adults36.6%32.7–40.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Depression among adults20.3%17.4–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.8–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%33.7–41.7
Obesity among adults34.9%29.3–41.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.1–10.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.8–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.1–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.4–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.7–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%62.6–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.1–72.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.4–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.4–23.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.6–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%22.0–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%25.3–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.9%15.4–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.4–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.9–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.7–14.1
Any disability among adults28.2%24.6–32.4
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.2
Independent living disability among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Mobility disability among adults13.7%11.8–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.6–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.1–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.4–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.3
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.3–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription85.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate84.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households60.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$105,255$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$247,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,302$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured