Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50609

in Beaman, IowaPopulation 377

56.47/ 100

Ranked #7,796 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #166 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #13 of 25 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.27%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.4%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.8%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Beaman, Iowa (ZIP 50609) lands in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,796th) and the top 18% of Iowa (166th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: poverty stands in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and modeled pfas settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 9.2% nationally, modeled transportation lands in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 10.4% nationally. On the other hand, modeled radon sits in the top 3.9% nationally, binge drinking rests in the top 6.2% nationally, and arsenic is in the top 7.2% nationally. Walkability stands in the bottom 7.7% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 50621, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.3%26.2–32.4
High blood pressure among adults36.7%33.0–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.1
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.0–7.9
Depression among adults19.4%16.7–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.2–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%34.3–42.0
Obesity among adults39.7%33.3–46.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.3–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.6–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.8–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.3–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.3–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.0%66.8–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.8%66.9–72.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%73.0–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%17.2–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.6–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%20.4–28.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%28.0–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.2–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Any disability among adults27.1%23.6–30.8
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Mobility disability among adults12.7%10.9–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%19.3–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.4–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.8–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.2–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.3–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–642.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)0.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription90.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households71.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+21.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age46.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$90,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$241,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$785$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured