Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51230

in Alvord, IowaPopulation 478

54.53/ 100

Ranked #10,024 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #296 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

23.2%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Radon

4.1 pCi/L

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

38.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

23.8%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

98.9%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.5%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.64%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

In overall standing, Alvord, Iowa (ZIP 51230) comes out in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,024th) and the top 32% of Iowa (296th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: poverty is at the national minimum, homeownership resides in the top 5.2% nationally, and fiber broadband rests in the top 5.8% nationally. Home broadband subscription lies in the top 6.8% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and radon settles in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled arsenic registers in the top 1.8% nationally, and households without a vehicle stands in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled nitrate lands in the top 7.0% nationally, and energy burden is in the top 6.4% nationally.

In plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 51240, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.8%20.8–26.8
High blood pressure among adults31.9%28.1–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.1–6.9
Depression among adults19.9%16.9–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.5–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%29.2–37.3
Obesity among adults37.7%30.0–45.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.6–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.6–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%72.8–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.8%71.9–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.2–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%63.7–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%65.9–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.7%72.6–85.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.2%19.4–27.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%11.7–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%19.2–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.2%25.3–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%13.6–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.6–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.5–15.3
Any disability among adults26.8%22.6–31.2
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.0–7.7
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.2–12.7
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%19.9–27.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.3–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.3–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Loneliness among adults32.9%27.9–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)1.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle23.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription98.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate98.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households51.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+29.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age51.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$75,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$190,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured