Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51053

in Schaller, IowaPopulation 1,016

50.24/ 100

Ranked #15,905 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #640 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

5.4 pCi/L

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.94 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

31.5%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.7%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.4%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

Schaller, Iowa (ZIP 51053), in overall standing, comes out in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,905th) and the bottom 31% of Iowa (640th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: grocery settles in the top 0.4% nationally, modeled pfas lands in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and fiber broadband rests in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Against that, modeled radon lands in the top 0.09% nationally, and arsenic rests in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the top 8.3% nationally, and walkability lands in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the top 11.3% nationally, and fine-particle settles in the top 14.4% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 51002, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.5–33.2
High blood pressure among adults36.7%32.6–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.1–9.5
Depression among adults20.0%17.0–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.0–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%32.9–41.7
Obesity among adults42.4%34.5–50.8
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.3–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.6–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.3–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%73.8–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.4–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%63.7–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.2%62.9–69.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%71.0–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.3–23.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.1–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%23.8–33.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%28.9–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%17.6–23.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.5–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.5–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.5
Any disability among adults31.4%27.0–35.7
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Mobility disability among adults15.0%12.8–17.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%21.0–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.5–16.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.4–13.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.8–12.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.5
Loneliness among adults31.7%27.2–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–647.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription84.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate86.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population7.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households47.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+15.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age41.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$72,534$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$91,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$758$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.3 yr ± 2.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.66 years of 85.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured