Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50673

in Stout, IowaPopulation 250

55.12/ 100

Ranked #9,312 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #256 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #16 of 25 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.6%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

17.8 mi

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

89 intersections/sq mi

in the top 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Stout, Iowa (ZIP 50673) sits in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,312th) and the top 28% of Iowa (256th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 1.4% nationally, modeled transportation noise sits at the national minimum, and floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled energy burden resides in the top 2.5% nationally, and binge drinking sits in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands at the national minimum, and distance to a community health center resides in the top 9.7% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 50624, about 0.5 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.8%

14%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.7%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%23.4–30.2
High blood pressure among adults34.4%30.0–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.6–7.9
Depression among adults19.9%16.6–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.1–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%31.1–40.1
Obesity among adults38.8%30.9–47.1
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.2–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.7–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%73.9–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.3–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%83.8–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%62.9–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.9%66.3–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%70.8–84.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.1%17.4–25.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%12.6–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%19.7–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%26.9–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%13.6–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.0–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%10.8–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%10.7–14.5
Any disability among adults27.1%23.0–31.4
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.1–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%19.7–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.5–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.0–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.7–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.6–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.6–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households34.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+8.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$66,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$122,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$775$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.3 yr ± 1.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.67 years of 83.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured