Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50471

in Rudd, IowaPopulation 740

56.77/ 100

Ranked #7,490 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #146 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.5%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

6.2%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

9 days/year

in the top 38% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Rudd, Iowa (ZIP 50471) lands in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,490th) and the top 16% of Iowa (146th).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: fiber broadband rests in the top 3.6% nationally, housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 12.4% nationally, housing insecurity is in the bottom 13.3% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and radon stands in the top 7.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests in the top 14.6% nationally.

Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. On the overall standing, ZIP 50458, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.2–30.6
High blood pressure among adults33.5%29.6–37.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.6–7.6
Depression among adults20.9%17.7–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.0–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%31.7–40.1
Obesity among adults38.0%30.6–45.4
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.2–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.9–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.6–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.5–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.4–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%65.8–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.0%66.6–73.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.1%74.7–86.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.5%17.1–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.8–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%18.8–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%24.8–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.4–18.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.2–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.6–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.0–14.6
Any disability among adults26.5%22.7–30.6
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.6
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.0–13.6
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.2–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.5–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.9–8.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.4
Loneliness among adults32.7%28.0–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)7.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription93.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)6.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate81.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households46.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$93,542$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$132,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$859$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 1.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.70 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured