Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50275

in Woodburn, IowaPopulation 506

53.58/ 100

Ranked #11,252 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #368 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

10.5%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Park land

4.7%

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

5.1 mi

in the top 28% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Woodburn, Iowa (ZIP 50275) sits in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,252nd) and the top 40% of Iowa (368th).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 8.9% nationally, housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 14.0% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 14.3% nationally, modeled transportation rests in the bottom 15% nationally, and households without a vehicle sits in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon registers in the top 5.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 14.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden resides in the top 11.3% nationally, and binge drinking lies in the top 13.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 50210, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.2%27.8–35.0
High blood pressure among adults38.0%33.8–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.7–9.1
Depression among adults20.3%17.2–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.8–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.5–43.7
Obesity among adults40.1%32.7–48.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.1–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.7–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.5–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.3–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.0–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%64.2–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.7%64.3–70.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.3–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%15.6–22.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%12.5–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%21.0–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%25.0–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.0–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.5–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.8–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.5
Any disability among adults28.6%24.7–33.0
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.0–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.5–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.0–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.8–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.4
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.6–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)1.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription78.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate86.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households81.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+29.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age51.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$72,232$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$122,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured