Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50146

in Linden, IowaPopulation 577

52.92/ 100

Ranked #12,201 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #418 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #67 of 85 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.7 pCi/L

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.5%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

23.9 mi

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.2%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.5%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.11%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.2%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Linden, Iowa (ZIP 50146) ranks in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,201st) and the top 45% of Iowa (418th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 8.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon sits in the top 3.7% nationally, nitrate resides in the top 6.0% nationally, and binge drinking stands in the top 5.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits in the top 6.2% nationally, unemployment resides in the top 6.9% nationally, and modeled arsenic stands in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled energy burden sits in the top 7.7% nationally.

For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 50167, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.6%25.7–31.7
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.7–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Depression among adults19.9%17.2–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.3–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%33.8–41.3
Obesity among adults36.3%30.6–42.2
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.8–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.4–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.3–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.6–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.4–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%62.6–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.5%64.3–70.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%69.9–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.1%17.2–23.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.4–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%20.9–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults29.5%24.9–34.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.0–20.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.3–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.4–14.9
Any disability among adults28.9%25.0–32.8
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.8%10.9–14.8
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.3–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.8–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.2–10.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.3–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Loneliness among adults29.0%25.1–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–642.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)10.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)11.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate62.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population10.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households21.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+6.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$109,261$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$425,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.6 yr ± 2.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.13 years of 83.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured