Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50101

in Galt, IowaPopulation 57

54.22/ 100

Ranked #10,419 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #315 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$173,542

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

14.1%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.3%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.6%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.4%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

48.3%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Galt, Iowa (ZIP 50101), by its overall standing, sits in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,419th) and the top 34% of Iowa (315th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: household income registers in the top 2.1% nationally, poverty stands at the national minimum, and modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled hearing disability lies in the top 0.8% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum, and homeownership registers in the bottom 8.2% nationally.

The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 50034, just across the boundary. Poverty registers at the national minimum.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.4%

21%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.0%31.9–40.3
High blood pressure among adults46.5%41.9–51.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.9%12.5–15.4
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.7–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults12.3%10.7–14.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.2–10.7
Depression among adults15.7%13.2–18.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.6%14.2–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.7%39.0–48.7
Obesity among adults37.9%30.5–45.9
Stroke among adults5.3%4.5–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%10.9–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%5.6–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.7%83.1–88.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.9%81.0–86.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.1%89.6–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%62.5–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.4–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%70.7–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.2–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%10.7–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%23.5–34.5
Short sleep duration among adults29.4%23.6–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.6%17.0–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults12.1%10.4–13.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.2–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.4–13.2
Any disability among adults34.1%29.3–39.4
Hearing disability among adults14.1%12.3–16.0
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.2–8.9
Mobility disability among adults18.0%14.8–21.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.4–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.4–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%18.3–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%7.6–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%5.9–10.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.8–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.4–6.4
Loneliness among adults27.6%22.8–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.2–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate48.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households45.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+8.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age44.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$173,542$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$45,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured