Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50022

in Atlantic, IowaPopulation 8,526

45.18/ 100

Ranked #22,216 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #875 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 5.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.8 pCi/L

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

35.5 mi

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.25 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.99 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.10%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Atlantic, Iowa (ZIP 50022) ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,216th) and the bottom 5.1% of Iowa (875th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled radon rests in the top 0.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands at the national minimum. Distance to a community health center lies in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled nitrate sits in the top 8.2% nationally. On the better side, mental-health providers is in the top 1.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Elder services resides in the top 5.7% nationally, dental providers registers in the top 6.8% nationally, and pharmacy rests in the top 9.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Close by, ZIP 50020, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%29.9–37.2
High blood pressure among adults40.8%36.4–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.6–11.4
Depression among adults21.5%18.3–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.5–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%34.9–43.5
Obesity among adults41.4%33.6–49.4
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.5%13.5–19.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.4–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.8–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.1–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.8–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%63.9–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.2–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.6–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.6–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%15.7–21.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%25.2–34.9
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%25.9–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%19.3–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.7–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.4–17.1
Any disability among adults35.0%30.7–39.7
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.0
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.4–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.1%20.6–27.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%11.9–16.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.7–16.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.4–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Loneliness among adults33.3%28.3–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle6.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription85.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate66.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age41.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$63,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$157,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$773$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured