Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10006

in New York, New YorkPopulation 4,096

70.76/ 100

Ranked #458 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.5%)

Ranked #77 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 4.5%)

Ranked #161 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

28.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

41.4%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

14.0%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

15.4%

in the bottom 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$190,170

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

470 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

90.1%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.93 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.7%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

3.4%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 10006, one of several in New York, New York lands in the top 1.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (458th) and the top 4.5% of New York (77th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled high blood pressure settles in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and obesity resides in the bottom 0.09% nationally. Household income registers in the top 1.4% nationally, and walkability rests in the top 0.2% nationally. Mental-health providers stands in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and modeled diabetes lands in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Set against that, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 0.01% nationally, and households without a vehicle settles in the top 0.2% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 10004, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.06%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Disability

in the top 0.5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Disability

in the top 1.0%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 15.1; chronic-disease standing 99.8 (top 1%) — 85 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,542 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults9.7%8.7–10.9
High blood pressure among adults14.0%12.7–15.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.4–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults1.7%1.5–1.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.9%1.6–2.3
Depression among adults21.1%19.1–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened25.5%23.6–27.8
Obesity among adults15.4%13.5–17.9
Stroke among adults1.0%0.9–1.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.8%3.8–5.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.9%3.1–5.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure54.1%50.9–57.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%71.8–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%84.9–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.9%58.5–65.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.8%71.5–76.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%74.5–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults28.5%26.1–31.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.0%4.5–7.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults12.3%10.4–14.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%30.0–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults8.2%7.0–9.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults7.0%6.1–8.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.4%7.9–11.4
Any disability among adults15.1%13.1–17.6
Hearing disability among adults2.1%1.8–2.4
Independent living disability among adults4.3%3.6–5.2
Mobility disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.8
Self-care disability among adults1.3%1.1–1.5
Vision disability among adults2.1%1.8–2.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%21.8–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%6.9–11.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.5–8.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.2–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.7
Loneliness among adults39.9%36.1–43.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.8–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6414.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)84.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle90.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription98.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate15.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population36.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households48.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+3.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age31.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$190,170$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$1,090,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured