Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49968

in Wakefield, MichiganPopulation 2,203

48.83/ 100

Ranked #17,883 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #580 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.48 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

26.5 mi

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.48 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

11.2 per million

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.9 days/year

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.97 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.0%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

67%

in the top 10.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Wakefield, Michigan (ZIP 49968) lands in the bottom 44% nationally (17,883rd) and the bottom 40% of Michigan (580th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: grocery lands in the top 1.7% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 2.6% nationally, and pharmacy stands in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 5.6% nationally, modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 6.9% nationally, and dental providers resides in the top 7.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 6.5% nationally, and walkability is in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability lands in the top 9.4% nationally.

Put simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 49911, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.9%35.0–42.9
High blood pressure among adults45.0%40.2–49.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.9%11.7–14.2
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.2–13.3
Depression among adults26.3%22.5–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.3–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%37.5–46.7
Obesity among adults37.1%28.9–45.8
Stroke among adults5.1%4.5–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%11.8–17.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.8–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%79.8–85.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%80.4–86.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.9%88.4–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%65.0–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%63.8–71.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%67.8–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.2–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.0–34.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%25.8–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%19.5–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.9–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.0–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.7–16.3
Any disability among adults37.2%32.5–41.7
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Mobility disability among adults19.2%16.7–21.8
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.6–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.5–16.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%11.9–17.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.1–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.6
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.4–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate85.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+26.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age48.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$55,759$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$91,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$656$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured