Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49945

in Lake Linden, MichiganPopulation 2,729

49.01/ 100

Ranked #17,650 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #571 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

7.3 days/year

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.61%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Lake Linden, Michigan (ZIP 49945) ranks in the bottom 45% nationally (17,650th) and the bottom 41% of Michigan (571st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and humid heat lands in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep is in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site registers at the national minimum, and walkability rests in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Unemployment lies in the top 11.9% nationally.

To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 49916, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.8%33.3–40.6
High blood pressure among adults42.0%37.9–46.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.9%10.8–13.1
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
Depression among adults26.2%22.6–30.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.4–44.0
Obesity among adults38.2%31.1–46.1
Stroke among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.3%12.6–18.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.3–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%79.2–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.2–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%86.9–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%66.7–75.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.5%64.3–70.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%65.9–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.8–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.3–19.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%22.7–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%24.7–36.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%19.0–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.3–17.0
Any disability among adults36.8%32.4–41.5
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.8–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%11.9–16.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.2–17.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.5–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)8.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)9.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription85.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate78.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households70.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+31.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age52.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$59,453$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$159,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$556$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 1.3778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.37 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured