Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48634

in Linwood, MichiganPopulation 4,334

52.91/ 100

Ranked #12,206 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #366 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 38%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Bay City, MI metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

97.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.9%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Linwood, Michigan (ZIP 48634) sits in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,206th) and the top 38% of Michigan (366th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: homeownership resides in the top 6.3% nationally, recreation sits in the top 17% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 19% nationally. Modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 19% nationally, and colon screening sits in the top 19% nationally. Against that, modeled arsenic stands in the top 9.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Walkability sits in the bottom 19% nationally. Physicians stands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband resides in the bottom 20% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 48611, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bay City, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.0–37.6
High blood pressure among adults38.6%34.3–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.9–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
Depression among adults26.4%22.7–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.8–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%32.9–42.1
Obesity among adults37.3%30.2–44.9
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.5–13.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.1–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.2–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.2–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.1–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%65.5–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.2%66.9–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.6–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.7–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.1–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%21.3–30.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%27.2–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%16.3–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.2–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.5–16.2
Any disability among adults31.6%27.4–36.3
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.7
Mobility disability among adults14.9%12.8–17.4
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.4–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.2–15.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.3–13.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.8–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.8
Loneliness among adults30.8%25.8–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.8–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–648.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription84.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate97.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households63.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+26.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age48.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$87,992$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$167,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$751$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured