Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49548

in Wyoming, MichiganPopulation 34,777

46.26/ 100

Ranked #21,027 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #733 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #66 of 79 Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

88.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.7%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.8%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.7%

in the top 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.3%

in the top 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

17.2%

in the top 14.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

22.7%

in the top 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 49548, one of several in Wyoming, Michigan, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 34% nationally (21,027th) and the bottom 25% of Michigan (733rd).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled pfas lands in the top 0.6% nationally, distance to a Superfund site resides at the national minimum, and modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 8.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 12.0% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 12.9% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 4.2% nationally, and mental-health providers rests in the top 9.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Transit registers in the top 12.7% nationally, and walkability lands in the top 13.2% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 49315, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $61,636 predicts 78.2 years — 1.7 years below.

    Ranked #2,156 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.0 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.2 years — 3.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,887 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 67.4 — 61 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,498 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.6–27.6
High blood pressure among adults33.8%30.6–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%7.1–8.7
Depression among adults28.3%25.0–31.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.7%27.5–33.8
Obesity among adults38.5%33.6–43.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.4%11.8–17.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%10.0–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%69.8–75.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.3–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.6%81.6–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.0%59.7–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%57.9–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%66.7–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.8–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.5–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%24.7–32.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%32.7–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%20.0–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.6–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.4–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.5–19.1
Any disability among adults32.7%29.2–36.2
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.0
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.2–15.5
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%24.0–31.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%20.0–25.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.7%18.2–23.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.0–19.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Loneliness among adults35.3%31.1–39.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.3–13.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)16.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription91.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate73.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population15.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households38.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+11.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age33.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$61,636$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$159,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,207$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured