Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49270

in Petersburg, MichiganPopulation 5,567

52.95/ 100

Ranked #12,163 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #364 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #7 of 17 Monroe, MI ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

11.4%

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.1%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

72.3%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Petersburg, Michigan (ZIP 49270) lands in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,163rd) and the top 37% of Michigan (364th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 11.4% nationally, and homeownership rests in the top 13.0% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss resides in the bottom 17% nationally, and uninsured settles in the bottom 11.7% nationally. Modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 20% nationally. Set against that, modeled pfas sits in the top 13.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 18% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking stands in the top 18% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. On the overall standing, ZIP 48131, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Monroe, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.3 ± 2.4 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.4 years — 3.9 years above them.

    Ranked #390 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.6–35.0
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.7–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.0–9.1
Depression among adults26.9%23.5–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%33.9–41.5
Obesity among adults40.0%34.1–46.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.1–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.7–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%74.9–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.2–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.5–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%65.7–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.8%66.6–72.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%65.3–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.3–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.5–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.3–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%31.0–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.4–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.7–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.0–15.4
Any disability among adults30.5%26.8–34.4
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.5
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.8
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.0–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.4–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.7–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Loneliness among adults31.1%26.6–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate92.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households60.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$94,840$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$297,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$918$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured