Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04957

in Norridgewock, MainePopulation 4,006

38.47/ 100

Ranked #27,742 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.5%)

Ranked #375 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 8.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

31.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.25 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.4%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

94%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.3%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

12.0%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

27.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

11.0%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

11.3%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Norridgewock, Maine (ZIP 04957) lands in the bottom 13.5% nationally (27,742nd) and the bottom 8.1% of Maine (375th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: grocery resides in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband is in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled tree cover sits in the top 12.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and tooth loss lies in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled energy burden stands in the top 8.9% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 12.6% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 12.3% nationally, and utility shutoff resides in the top 14.2% nationally.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. On the overall standing, ZIP 04911, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.5%33.6–39.5
High blood pressure among adults40.5%37.3–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults13.9%12.4–15.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.5%11.0–14.0
Depression among adults29.7%26.5–32.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.0–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%38.1–44.7
Obesity among adults39.1%34.3–44.0
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.4%20.8–28.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.1–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.3–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.8%80.2–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.8–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%63.6–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.0%52.8–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.9%68.0–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.5–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%19.2–25.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.1%26.2–34.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%34.2–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.6–28.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.5–22.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%16.3–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.2–21.6
Any disability among adults39.4%35.6–43.3
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Independent living disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.7–21.4
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.9–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.2–19.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.7%22.1–29.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.8–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.5
Loneliness among adults34.2%30.5–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.4–13.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate84.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households72.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age48.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$65,931$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$179,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,073$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured