Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48843

in Howell, MichiganPopulation 48,014

59.63/ 100

Ranked #5,126 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #131 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 13.5%)

Ranked #71 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

Under 0.1 mi

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

458 units

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

59.4%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.6%

in the bottom 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.2%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.6%

in the bottom 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

79.6%

in the top 13.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 48843, one of several in Howell, Michigan, overall, ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,126th) and the top 13.5% of Michigan (131st).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 5.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss rests in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 11.9% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the top 7.6% nationally, and pfas lies in the top 8.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 48114, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 26.8; chronic-disease standing 76.9 — 50 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,384 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.6–29.2
High blood pressure among adults30.7%28.0–33.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.3
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Depression among adults26.2%23.4–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.4%31.6–37.2
Obesity among adults32.5%28.4–36.5
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.8–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.0%4.2–5.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.7–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.2–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%86.9–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%67.9–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.3%71.7–76.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%74.2–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.7–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%10.8–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%18.3–23.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.3%27.2–35.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.6%13.0–16.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%11.1–13.9
Any disability among adults25.6%22.9–28.5
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.5–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Loneliness among adults30.2%26.1–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)38.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate78.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+18.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age42.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$94,577$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$348,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,313$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured