Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48383

in White Lake, MichiganPopulation 13,285

56.84/ 100

Ranked #7,423 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #202 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #88 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

74.9%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.3 mi

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

95.5%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

71.8%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 48383, one of several in White Lake, Michigan, in overall standing, comes out in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,423rd) and the top 21% of Michigan (202nd).

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: homeownership sits in the top 10.2% nationally, park land stands in the top 11.0% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 14.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the top 17% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 19% nationally. Against that, modeled pfas resides in the top 3.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Physicians resides at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 20% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 48350, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%24.5–29.1
High blood pressure among adults34.9%32.2–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.7–8.6
Depression among adults24.2%21.5–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.1–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%32.3–37.7
Obesity among adults33.7%30.0–37.5
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.4%7.7–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.8–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.0–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.3–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.0–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%65.2–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.8%67.2–72.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%66.4–77.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.5–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.6–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%18.3–23.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%28.7–35.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%15.0–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.5–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.9–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%12.0–15.2
Any disability among adults26.3%23.5–29.2
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%18.2–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.4–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.0–13.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.0–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.8
Loneliness among adults31.3%27.7–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate93.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households58.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age40.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$102,072$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$336,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,732$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured