Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48157

in Luna Pier, MichiganPopulation 1,244

45.39/ 100

Ranked #22,004 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #777 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #16 of 17 Monroe, MI ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

70%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.5%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.2%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

26%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

100 intersections/sq mi

in the top 10.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

70%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Luna Pier, Michigan (ZIP 48157) ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,004th) and the bottom 20% of Michigan (777th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: floodplain exposure resides in the top 1.7% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise rests in the top 6.2% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 6.4% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Poverty lands in the top 9.8% nationally. More encouragingly, fatal road crashes sits at the national minimum, modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 10.3% nationally, and walkability settles in the top 10.4% nationally. Physicians resides in the top 12.1% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 48133, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Monroe, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.7–37.6
High blood pressure among adults38.6%34.8–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%7.9–11.3
Depression among adults27.8%24.3–31.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.2–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.1–42.9
Obesity among adults41.7%35.6–48.3
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%6.8–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%4.8–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.8–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.4–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.7–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%68.0–75.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.6%66.3–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%62.5–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.3–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.2–19.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%20.8–30.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%30.4–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%17.0–23.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.2–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.3–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%12.7–17.3
Any disability among adults33.5%28.9–38.5
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.1–9.3
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.7–10.6
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.2–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.8
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.0–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%10.5–16.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.2–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.5–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.9–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate83.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households56.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+31.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age50.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$61,641$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$188,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$395$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 2.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.26 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured