Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48137

in Gregory, MichiganPopulation 4,157

57.75/ 100

Ranked #6,611 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #176 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #80 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

14.6%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.0%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.8 pCi/L

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.1%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

0.54%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Gregory, Michigan (ZIP 48137) lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,611th) and the top 18% of Michigan (176th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: park land registers in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and tooth loss is in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 14.3% nationally, and colon screening lands in the top 11.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 16% nationally, and modeled uninsured stands in the bottom 6.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon rests in the top 14.9% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 16% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. On the overall standing, ZIP 48118, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%27.1–31.3
High blood pressure among adults33.1%30.8–35.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.6–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.4–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.4
Depression among adults26.8%24.5–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%33.4–38.1
Obesity among adults32.1%29.0–35.5
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%6.0–8.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.2–6.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%76.1–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%78.1–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.4%88.0–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%68.9–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.6%70.5–74.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%73.5–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%15.3–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%11.1–15.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%18.0–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%27.4–33.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.7–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.7–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.1
Any disability among adults26.7%24.0–29.5
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.5–7.9
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%17.4–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.1–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.6
Loneliness among adults29.7%26.3–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate88.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households71.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+26.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age56.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$78,973$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$306,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,084$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured