Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48050

in New Haven, MichiganPopulation 1,338

54.36/ 100

Ranked #10,244 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #294 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #116 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.5%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

11.2%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.5%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 48050, one of several in New Haven, Michigan lands in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,244th) and the top 30% of Michigan (294th).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and poverty stands in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 11.1% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the top 10.6% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Against that, fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Walkability sits in the bottom 12.2% nationally, modeled arsenic rests in the top 12.3% nationally, and distance to an emergency room is in the top 16% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 48005, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%29.4–35.6
High blood pressure among adults38.3%35.0–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.1–10.3
Depression among adults26.9%23.8–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.6–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.4–43.4
Obesity among adults36.8%32.3–41.8
Stroke among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.7–11.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.2–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.3–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%78.9–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%86.8–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%68.0–75.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.2%69.4–74.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%72.2–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.8–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%12.0–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.7%20.5–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%30.9–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%15.7–22.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.7–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.4–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%11.7–16.3
Any disability among adults31.5%27.1–36.3
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.5–16.3
Self-care disability among adults3.5%2.9–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.5–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.4–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%8.9–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.8–12.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.4–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.6
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.4–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.5–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–643.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households73.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+29.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age55.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$91,136$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$337,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 1.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.88 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured