ZIP code
48023
in Fair Haven, MichiganPopulation 5,031
53.71/ 100
Ranked #11,073 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)
Ranked #325 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 33%)
Ranked #124 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 42%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
18.9%
in the top 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Child-care access
0.6 per 1,000 residents
in the top 7.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
0.67%
in the top 16% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS84thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Fair Haven, Michigan (ZIP 48023) ranks in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,073rd) and the top 33% of Michigan (325th).
The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: childcare is in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled colon screening settles in the top 16% nationally. Modeled tooth loss resides in the bottom 18% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the top 20% nationally. Modeled uninsured rests in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Set against that, modeled arsenic stands in the top 7.0% nationally, modeled pfas lies in the top 14.1% nationally, and slow internet speeds lands in the top 16% nationally. Unemployment sits in the top 17% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 19% nationally.
To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 48047, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 79%
13%
Disability
healthier than 66%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 68%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 58%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 59%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 57%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 48%
5%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 17%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 69%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 63%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 74%
14%
Disability
healthier than 69%
7%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 52%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 52%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 42%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 50%
5%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 18%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 48%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 42%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 44%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Disability
healthier than 47%
7%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 29%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 21%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 29%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
48039
Michiganshares a border
Score 52.86
Closest healthier
48047
Michiganshares a border
Score 57.20
Similar health profile
49228
Michigan99% similar profile
Score 53.26
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.2% | 27.0–33.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 36.5% | 32.7–40.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.6% | 8.7–10.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.6% | 10.3–13.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.8% | 6.0–7.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.0% | 6.9–9.4 |
| Depression among adults | 27.5% | 24.0–31.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.0% | 9.5–12.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 35.3% | 31.5–39.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.4% | 29.3–42.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.4% | 3.0–3.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.0% | 7.2–11.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.9% | 4.6–7.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.3% | 74.4–80.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.4% | 77.3–83.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.0% | 86.1–89.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.8% | 66.3–75.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 69.8% | 66.5–72.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.0% | 67.3–81.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.8% | 14.1–20.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.2% | 12.5–18.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.1% | 19.2–27.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.9% | 29.4–40.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.0% | 15.4–21.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.1% | 16.0–20.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.2% | 12.4–16.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.4% | 12.4–16.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.3% | 27.2–35.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.4–8.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.9% | 6.9–9.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 13.4% | 11.4–15.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.5% | 3.0–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.2% | 3.7–4.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.7% | 19.1–26.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.1% | 9.6–14.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 8.4–13.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.7% | 8.0–11.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.8% | 5.8–8.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.2% | 28.0–38.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.0% | 5.8–8.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 11.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 8.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 22.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 22.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973 |
| Broadband subscription | 94.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 27.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973 |
| Homeownership rate | 80.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 85.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975 |
| Single-parent households | 54.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970 |
| Population 65+ | 16.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975 |
| Median age | 43.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974 |
| Median household income | $70,469 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962 |
| Median home value | $244,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952 |
| Median gross rent | $1,266 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $972 ($719–$1,368) n=849 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.2 yr ± 1.96 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.96 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured