Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47948

in Goodland, IndianaPopulation 998

43.67/ 100

Ranked #23,727 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #596 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #332 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 11.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.78 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

18.4 mi

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.33%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US13th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.10%

in the bottom 14.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.7%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Goodland, Indiana (ZIP 47948), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 26% nationally (23,727th) and the bottom 21% of Indiana (596th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: childcare lands in the top 4.1% nationally, floodplain exposure rests in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Against that, distance to an emergency room lands in the top 6.7% nationally, modeled obesity rests in the top 5.4% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden settles in the top 12.6% nationally, and tooth loss lands in the top 15% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 47977, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.4–36.9
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.8–44.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.7%9.2–12.3
Depression among adults26.4%23.0–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.6–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%35.9–44.0
Obesity among adults44.4%37.0–51.8
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.9%17.6–24.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.1–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.5–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.9–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.8–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%61.9–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.1%56.6–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%66.4–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.1–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%16.8–23.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.1%24.6–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%32.6–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%21.3–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%14.6–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%14.9–19.5
Any disability among adults36.5%31.9–40.9
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Mobility disability among adults17.8%15.2–20.3
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.2–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.5%13.7–19.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.3–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.3–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Loneliness among adults32.2%27.6–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6416.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)9.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate82.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households66.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age50.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$59,293$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$106,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$629$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured