Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47585

in Stendal, IndianaPopulation 592

46.49/ 100

Ranked #20,771 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #476 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.01%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.8%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

64.1%

in the top 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.48%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

11.1 mi

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

The read

Stendal, Indiana (ZIP 47585), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 35% nationally (20,771st) and the bottom 37% of Indiana (476th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 0.4% nationally. More encouragingly, poverty sits at the national minimum, and modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Modeled pfas rests in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 12.5% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 47523, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%30.7–38.1
High blood pressure among adults41.0%36.5–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.7–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.4–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.4–11.7
Depression among adults26.1%22.3–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.5–16.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%36.8–45.8
Obesity among adults39.0%30.5–46.4
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.1%12.3–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.4–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.1–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%77.8–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.3–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%63.1–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%55.8–63.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%66.0–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%11.8–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%15.6–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%22.8–32.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%31.8–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%18.9–26.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.7–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.7–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.3–17.7
Any disability among adults33.6%28.7–38.5
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.5–10.2
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.3–19.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.8–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.2–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.6–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.6–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.3
Loneliness among adults30.9%25.8–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.6–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription77.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate91.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households74.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age49.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$88,141$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$237,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.1 yr ± 2.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.45 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured