Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47114

in Crandall, IndianaPopulation 484

48.21/ 100

Ranked #18,670 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #368 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #57 of 114 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

13.4%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$103,427

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

82 days/year

in the top 33% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US67th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Crandall, Indiana (ZIP 47114) lands in the bottom 42% nationally (18,670th) and the top 49% of Indiana (368th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 13.6% nationally. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the bottom 14.4% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled transportation noise lands in the top 5.3% nationally, obesity registers in the top 7.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 12.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests in the top 16% nationally, and unemployment is in the top 18% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 47112, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.0–36.5
High blood pressure among adults40.9%36.3–45.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.0–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.7–10.6
Depression among adults24.4%20.9–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.8–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%36.8–45.7
Obesity among adults43.5%35.9–51.2
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%13.7–20.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.4–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.6–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.3–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%85.7–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%60.4–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%58.1–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%64.0–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.7–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.4–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%19.9–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.6%33.4–46.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.4–24.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%14.9–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.5–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.5–16.9
Any disability among adults32.3%27.6–37.0
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.7–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.0–17.8
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.2–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.5–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.6–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Loneliness among adults30.3%25.7–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–642.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)11.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle9.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate79.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households45.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age36.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$103,427$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$231,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$848$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured