Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

47016

in Cedar Grove, IndianaPopulation 773

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

54.12/ 100

Ranked #10,542 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #96 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 12.7%)

Ranked #51 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

47.3%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.1%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.8%

in the bottom 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

5.2%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.60%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.8%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.9%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

Cedar Grove, Indiana (ZIP 47016), by its composite score, sits in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,542nd) and the top 12.7% of Indiana (96th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: civic resides in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled transportation is in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Poverty registers in the bottom 11.1% nationally, modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 11.6% nationally, and homeownership sits in the top 14.2% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lies in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 13.3% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 45053, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.0–36.4
High blood pressure among adults40.8%36.4–45.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.1
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%6.5–9.3
Depression among adults23.4%20.1–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.1–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%36.9–45.9
Obesity among adults38.7%31.4–47.0
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.0%13.2–19.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.5–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%77.8–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.1–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.5%87.7–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%64.6–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.2–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%68.4–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.4–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.2–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%18.9–27.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%27.5–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.9%15.1–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.7–14.4
Any disability among adults29.6%25.3–34.3
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Independent living disability among adults6.8%5.8–8.0
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.6–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%17.7–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%6.8–11.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.3–5.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.7–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.2–5.9
Loneliness among adults30.0%25.3–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.3–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–640.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)1.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)7.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription47.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate91.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households62.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+26.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age58.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$69,880$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$300,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$763$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured