Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46341

in Hebron, IndianaPopulation 10,048

51.37/ 100

Ranked #14,323 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #203 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #270 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

35.1%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.3%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Hebron, Indiana (ZIP 46341) sits in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,323rd) and the top 27% of Indiana (203rd).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Dental providers lands in the top 15% nationally, subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 20% nationally, and modeled energy burden lies in the bottom 20% nationally. Poverty settles in the bottom 25% nationally. Against that, floodplain exposure stands in the top 7.9% nationally, and modeled arsenic is in the top 13.6% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 14.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 24% nationally.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 46307, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.6–32.8
High blood pressure among adults39.1%35.8–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Depression among adults24.2%21.4–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.2–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%36.3–42.8
Obesity among adults39.9%35.1–44.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%11.0–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.7–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.3–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.8–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.5–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%63.7–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%60.7–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%67.6–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%14.0–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%14.5–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%22.6–29.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%33.4–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.6%17.4–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.6–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.8–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.8–15.8
Any disability among adults30.1%26.8–33.3
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.3–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%20.0–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.6–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Loneliness among adults31.2%27.7–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.1–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6410.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+17.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age44.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$89,559$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$269,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$954$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 1.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.07 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured