Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46226

in Indianapolis, IndianaPopulation 47,099

37.86/ 100

Ranked #28,094 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.4%)

Ranked #717 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranked #111 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (bottom 3.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,489 units

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18.7%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.3%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

31%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.1%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

22.7%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

15.3%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.8 mi

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 46226, one of several in Indianapolis, Indiana ranks in the bottom 12.4% nationally (28,094th) and the bottom 5.3% of Indiana (717th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled short sleep lies in the top 3.4% nationally, and utility shutoff lands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 6.9% nationally, and food insecurity is in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled vision disability settles in the top 7.2% nationally, housing insecurity resides in the top 5.9% nationally, and transportation registers in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 7.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 6.4% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 0.6% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Close by, ZIP 46205, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.9 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $50,325 predicts 77.4 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,635 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.9 ± 1.0 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 3.5 years below them.

    Ranked #2,751 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%26.5–30.4
High blood pressure among adults45.6%43.3–48.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.3–6.3
Current asthma among adults13.1%11.9–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.8–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Depression among adults24.3%22.1–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%16.6–19.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%34.7–39.4
Obesity among adults44.9%41.6–48.3
Stroke among adults5.1%4.7–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.3%22.2–28.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.0%13.4–16.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%76.2–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%78.6–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.7–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%60.4–66.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.6%48.0–53.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%73.1–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%13.2–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.1%17.2–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.0%29.3–34.8
Short sleep duration among adults44.8%41.7–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%26.8–31.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.8–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.9–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.8–20.3
Any disability among adults36.9%34.2–39.6
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Independent living disability among adults11.8%10.7–13.0
Mobility disability among adults20.0%18.3–21.7
Self-care disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.2
Vision disability among adults9.1%8.4–9.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.5%27.0–32.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%28.7–33.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.6%21.5–26.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%20.7–24.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.9–16.8
Loneliness among adults38.3%35.5–41.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.7%17.0–20.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6414.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)17.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle11.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription86.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate46.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population12.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households36.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+12.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age32.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$50,325$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$158,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,133$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.9 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 73.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured