Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46041

in Frankfort, IndianaPopulation 23,134

44.86/ 100

Ranked #22,563 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #542 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

46.1%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

13.3%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Frankfort, Indiana (ZIP 46041), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 30% nationally (22,563rd) and the bottom 28% of Indiana (542nd).

continue reading

The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 0.8% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 9.6% nationally, and radon sits in the top 14.8% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the top 14.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. On the better side, distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 14.4% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 46035, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.9%26.5–33.1
High blood pressure among adults38.6%34.3–42.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Depression among adults24.6%20.9–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.1–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%35.9–44.6
Obesity among adults40.9%33.3–48.6
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.5%13.7–19.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.6–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.7–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.3–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.5–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%60.1–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.2%53.5–60.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.6–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.7–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.7–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.5%24.9–34.1
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%32.5–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%21.3–27.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.6–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%15.0–18.8
Any disability among adults34.2%29.7–38.5
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.1–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.4–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.1%15.7–20.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.7–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.8–15.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.9–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)15.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate71.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population12.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age36.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$63,157$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$161,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$906$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured