Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45724

in Cutler, OhioPopulation 1,218

45.77/ 100

Ranked #21,584 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #687 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

45.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.03%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.9 µg/L

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.8%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

67.2%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

6.1 mi

in the top 24% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US76th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Cutler, Ohio (ZIP 45724) ranks in the bottom 33% nationally (21,584th) and the bottom 42% of Ohio (687th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 6.4% nationally, and lithium in drinking water is in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands in the top 10.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure lies in the bottom 12.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled obesity resides in the top 3.8% nationally, crowded housing lands in the top 7.0% nationally, and lead in tap water registers in the top 13.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the top 15% nationally, and walkability rests in the bottom 17% nationally.

In plainer terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 45711, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%30.0–36.3
High blood pressure among adults39.8%36.1–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Depression among adults26.9%23.6–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.7–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.6–40.0
Obesity among adults45.4%39.6–51.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.0%14.9–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.8–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.0–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.2–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.1–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%57.9–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.6–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%71.7–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.5–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.1–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%25.0–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.4%35.5–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.1–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.6–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.3–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.1–17.2
Any disability among adults31.2%27.3–35.3
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.6–10.0
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.0–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.8–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.0–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.6–14.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.5–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.6–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate82.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households71.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+20.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$58,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$149,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 1.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.86 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured